St. Mary's Church
August 26, 2008
Most Rev. Raymond L. Burke
Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura
Piazza della Concellaria 1
00186
Re: St.
Mary's,
Dear Most Rev. Raymond L. Burke:
The purpose of this letter is to formally appeal the August 5, 2008 Decree (Prot. N. 20082142] issued by the Congregation for the Clergy, postmarked August 18, 2008 (Attachment 1). We believe there has been a gross miscarriage of justice.
We respectfully request your consideration of the following:
a) In St. Mary's June 2005 first year report written by
Administrator Fr. Finnegan, St. Mary's parishioners were informed that,
"St Mary's would become a mission of Holy Cross with Fr. Yeazel as its administrator." This report also stated,
"St. Mary's will not lose its own identity and that is something that is
now assured whereas it was not assured before" (Attachment 2). In Fr. John
Finnegan's September 17, 2005 weekly letter to parishioners he notified St.
Mary's parishioners of the diocesan plans to become a "
Decree from the Congregation for the Clergy. Historically, missions remained
operational for years in the Syracuse Diocese and did not portend suppression
or closure. It is simply a status where two parishes share one pastor and is
not synonymous with suppression or parish closures. Precedent was set when St.
Mary's experienced "
b)
In
the August 5,2008 Decree, The Congregation for the Clergy concluded in item #14
that "The Bishop indicated, at least in summary fashion, the reasons for
his actions, and they are sufficient" and referred to Bishop Moynihan's
April 4, 2007 letter (attachment 5]. We strongly question this conclusion. In the April 4, 2007 letter, Bishop Moynihan
suggests "sweeping demographic changes and limited human and financial
resources" as the reason for closure. The changes in demographics for St.
Mary's located in Jamesville have been on a very positive trend and our parish
is financially solvent in terms of both liquidity and tangible assets. The
laity of St. Mary's has responded directly to Bishop Moynihan's 2001 Pastoral
Care letter, negating the limited human resource factor. The most fundamental
right of a parish in canon law is the right to come into existence, be
acknowledged and continue its existence. We understand canonically that
a shortage of priests alone is not an adequate reason to suppress parishes. To
be suppressed, the impossibility of continued life must be clearly
demonstrated. St Mary's, is a financially viable,
active parish in a growing area (Attachment 6). St Mary's met or exceeded the
diocesan Indices For Parish Life. In Fr. John
Finnegan's September 17, 2005 weekly letter he says, "I don't know of any
parish which has the level of commitment and volunteerism that is much the
hallmark of the fine parish and community of good and faith-filled
people." Throughout the appeal process the St. Mary's community continues
to remain viable. There are also many active and retired priests who continue
to offer to minister to St. Mary's parishioners but are not permitted by the
Bishop, at this time. We believe that there has been an even greater
miscarriage of justice because the reasons given for closure by the Bishop do
not correspond to the facts of the case and are insufficient for closure.
c) In item #17 of the August 5, 2008 Decree,
the Dicastery found that "certainty is difficult
to attain". For this reason, we respectfully wish to appoint an advocate
from the
We would be happy to provide all correspondences and attachments
previously submitted to the Congregation for the Clergy. Please advice if you wish
us to do so.
Please provide us of
the cost of filing this appeal to the Apostolic Signatura
and any other procedures we
must follow.
We thank you in advance for your thoughtful
consideration.
Sincerely in Christ,
Members of the St.
Mary's Canon Appeal Committee
Colleen K, LaTray [et alia]
(As referred to by
The Congregation for the Clergy
Mark A. Donnelly
KATHLEEN E. LO
Notary Public, State of.
Onon. County
Lie. #01L05019831
Comm. Exp. Nov. 1,20
Cc: Archbishop Pietro Sambi - Apostolic Nuncio